Features
Reports
Branding
Software
Pricing
Training
Languages
Individual Reports
Agency Opportunities
DISC: A Layman's Guide
What is DISC?
Video: Introduction to DISC
DISC Profile Interpretations
DISC Factors
Team Building with DISC
History and Development of DISC
Personality Types
Applications: Putting DISC to Work
Validity and Reliability of DISC
Knowledge Base
(214) 613-3983
E-mail us
Skype us
Contact Details
FOLLOW US
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Google Plus Follow us on Facebook Follow us on LinkedIn
DISC profiling since 1994
22
years
(214) 613-3983
Flag
Features
Reports
Branding
Software
Pricing
Training
Languages
Individual Reports
Agency Opportunities
DISC: A Layman's Guide
What is DISC?
Video: Introduction to DISC
DISC Profile Interpretations
DISC Factors
Team Building with DISC
History and Development of DISC
Personality Types
Applications: Putting DISC to Work
Validity and Reliability of DISC
Knowledge Base
(214) 613-3983
E-mail us
Skype us
Contact Details

The questions of validity and reliability are often raised with regard to Discus and other similar systems. This section of the site reproduces a South African study, A Reliability and Validity Study on the Discus Personality Profiling System, by Karin Roodt of the prestigious Technikon Natal. Note that this study - known as The Roodt Report - relates not just to DISC in general but specifically to the Discus software.


A Reliability and Validity Study on the Discus Personality Profiling System

K. Roodt (Ms)
M Ed (Counselling and Guidance) (UNISA)
Psychologist (SAMDC)
Senior Lecturer: Department Human Resources Management, Technikon Natal

Abstract

The purpose of the investigation was to determine whether the Discus measuring instrument could be considered a reliable and valid instrument. The test-retest method was used in the reliability study and was administered to 90 employees from a variety of companies in Kwa Zulu-Natal and Gauteng. The Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was used and correlation scores of 0.728 (Dominance), 0.645 (Influence), 0.730 (Steadiness) and 0.550 (Compliance) were established. The p-value in all the cases was as low as 0.0001. This indicates significance at alpha = 0.001. It can therefore be concluded with 99.9% level of confidence that the Discus instrument is reliable.

In the validity exercise criterion-related validity was used. An exploratory study was undertaken in order to determine which of the 15 Factors (Factor B excluded) of the 16-PF correlated with the four dimensions of the Discus. One hundred and twenty respondents in South Africa were involved for this purpose. The Pearson's product-moment correlation coefficient was applied. It was found that Factors Q1, X=G, L, Q1 and X=Q2, E; E, Q2 and -I show significant correlations with Dominance at the 1% and 5% level of significance. Factors A, -Q2, H, F and -Q3 show significant correlations with Influence at the 1% and 5% level of significance. Factors -E and -Q1 show a correlation with Steadiness at the 5% level of significance. Factors -E, Q2, -H, -G and O show significant correlations with Compliance at the 1% and 5% level of significance. It can therefore be concluded that the correlations were significant.


Preface

Choose which of our great value business packages is best for you, and you'll be up and running with Discus in just a few minutes.

I would like somebody to call meSend me an Information PackI would like to profile myself

Request an Information Pack

Enter your e-mail address here, and we'll send you your Discus Information Pack directly to that address.

We'd appreciate it if you'd tell us how you heard about Discus.

Thank you. Your Information Pack has been sent to the address you gave us, and you should receive it shortly.

Arrange a callback

Contact name
Your contact number
Your e-mail address
Choose a day or days
that suit you best
Monday
Tuesday
Wednesday
Thursday
Friday
Saturday
Sunday
Choose a time or period to suit you (your local time)

FOLLOW US
Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Google Plus Follow us on Facebook Follow us on LinkedIn